Cloud Container Scanning Showdown: Which Tool is Best?


As a DevOps engineer, one of the most important aspects of guiding a successful cloud migration journey is security. Ensuring the safety and reliability of your container images is vital to protecting your cloud-native applications from potential vulnerabilities. However, there are plenty of possible tools out there, so choosing the right one isn’t always easy. 

To help you decide, we’ve prepared a comprehensive comparison of four popular different container scanning tools: Gripe, Trivy, Microsoft Defender for Containers, and Snyk. We’ll discuss what their main and additional features are, and which integration options they offer. Let’s get started! 

Our contenders 

Before we delve into the details of our comparison, let’s quickly introduce our contenders: 

  1. Grype is a scanner that checks for vulnerabilities in the most popular Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) databases. It is powered by Syft, a tool that generates a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). Both tools are open source, developed by Anchore, and focus on container images and filesystems.
  2. Trivy is another security scanner that not only detects vulnerabilities, but also configuration issues. For example, it can verify how secrets and other sensitive information are handled in your setup. It is a completely open-source project, with source code hosted on GitHub.
  3. Microsoft Defender for Containers is a specific part of Microsoft Defender for Cloud that focuses on scanning containers. It is mainly used with cloud resources like the Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), but it also has a preview available for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). It even offers on-premises support through Azure Arc.
  4. Snyk is a well-known security scanning tool that offers a container-specific solution with their Snyk Container product. It distinguishes itself from other tools by taking a developer-first approach. Besides identifying vulnerabilities, it will also guide developers on fixing these issues, and try to solve them itself. 
Grype1 Trivy1 Microsoft Defender for Containers1 Snyk Container1
Company Anchore Aquasecurity Microsoft Snyk
Free Yes Yes Only compute cost 100 container tests/month
GitHub stars 5.7k 17.2k
GitHub contributors 60 299
Documentation site GitHub README GitHub pages Microsoft Learn Snyk docs
Support OSes
Alpine Linux
Amazon Linux
Debian GNU/Linux
OpenSUSE Leap
Oracle Linux
Red Hat (Universal base image)
Red Hat (Enterprise Linux)
Rocky Linux
SUSE Enterprise Linux

Additional features 

Besides the key characteristics that we listed above, each tool also offers additional features. Let’s see what else Snyk Container, Gripe, Trivy, and Microsoft Defender for Containers bring to the table. 

Grype Trivy Microsoft Defender for Containers Snyk Container
Container image scan
File system
Find vulnerabilities in language-specific packages
IaC scanning
Sensitive information scanning
Software licenses

Trivy and Snyk Container stand out with their comprehensive feature sets. Microsoft Defender for Containers does not support as many features, but it’s worth pointing out that there are other flavors of Microsoft Defender that do, such as Microsoft Defender for DevOps. In the same vein, it’s worth mentioning that Snyk has several other products that support the features in this table, including Snyk Code, Snyk Infrastructure as Code, Snyk Cloud and Snyk Open Source. 


If there’s one thing that matters when deciding on which container scanning tool to use, it’s integrations. The more integrations a tool offers, the more your container security workflow will be streamlined. 

  • Command-line interface (CLI) tools can be used to investigate vulnerabilities locally. 
  • Source code management (SCM) can scan for vulnerabilities in Git repositories. 
  • Continuous integration (CI) can ensure security by breaking a build when vulnerabilities are found. 
  • Container registries can be integrated with to perform a scan on all its images. 
  • Kubernetes can be used to run scans on the workload that is running inside its containers. 

Let’s see how each tool stacks up in terms of integration options. The answer isn’t always a simple yes or no, so be sure to check our commentary below this table and keep in mind that new options are constantly being added. 

Grype Trivy Microsoft Defender for Containers Snyk Container
Container registries5

Grype offers an integration with VS Code and a CLI version for an enhanced developer experience but does not seem to support directly scanning a repository. It does offer a GitHub action, but this simply pulls images from a repository, instead of a direct scan like Snyk for Containers. 

Trivy also provides a dedicated VS Code extension for smooth scanning within the editor, and it can be used as a CLI. Repository scanning is available and well documented, and there are separate GitHub repositories for the GitHub action and Kubernetes operator. Container registries are not mentioned anywhere in the documentation. 

Microsoft Defender for Containers focuses on cloud resources, so it does not offer support for IDE, SCM or CI. However, it does offer support for running it on Azure Container Registry (ACR) or Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR). There is also an optional add-on for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) clusters dedicated to Kubernetes data plane hardening. 

Finally, Snyk Container shines with its broad range of integrations, all of which are documented on one page. As expected from a paid tool, it covers all bases. From IDEs and SCMs to CI/CD pipelines, container registries, and Kubernetes: if you’re willing to pay, Snyk Container can handle it. 


After carefully considering each offering’s features and integration options, we think that Trivy is an excellent choice for most, but not all companies. Its VS Code extension and CLI integration make it easy to work with, and its source code being hosted on GitHub makes it well-documented and transparent. 

However, in the end it all depends on your specific use case, technology stack, budget, and personal preferences. Make sure to explore the documentation and offerings of each tool through the links we’ve provided, so you can make an adequately informed decision. 

If you have any remaining questions, feel free to reach out for further insights and support in your cloud migration and container security endeavours. We specialise in the Azure ecosystem, but we’d be more than happy to help you out with any questions you may have. 




  1. Checked on GitHub on 2023-05-08 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
  2. CLI: Can be used for local investigation of vulnerabilities ↩︎
  3. SCM: Can scan for vulnerabilities in Git repositories ↩︎
  4. CI: Can break a build when vulnerabilities are found ↩︎
  5. Container registries: Can scan a container registry and perform a scan on all of its images ↩︎
  6. Kubernetes: Runs scans on the running workfload inside Kubernetes ↩︎